Friday, March 31, 2006

great illustration


In this week's New Yorker (April 3rd issue), P.C. Vey summed up my IRS debacle perfectly!! Honestly, at least in the cartoon, the accountant only added ONE zero. The goof at the IRS who 'tried' to finish my taxes added TWO zeros.....

(shaking head)



Site Meter

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Recovering

I'm in a recovery mode both physically and mentally. As most of my friends know, I ran a 50k back on February 11th. Physically, I really wasn't ready because I didn't (actually, wasn't able to due to travel/work) put in enough training miles. I did finish the race, but it definitely set my running back. After the swelling in my feet went down, my legs still felt weak and wobbly. Only in the last two weeks have I been able to up my milage to about 5 miles per run/twice a week. So far, so good, but I just have to keep trying!

Also, mentally, I'm adjusting to the news I got this week. SVA didn't accept me into their MFA illustration program. Bummer. Not to sound cocky, but I really thought I would be able to get in and was really looking forward to the experience of being in a artistically stimulating school environment, and moving to New York, the 'illustration capital (if there is such a thing!). The school didn't say what they based their decision on only saying in the letter, "we regret to inform you...",....yadda, yadda. You know it's never good news when you read that! It's just a case of me counting my chickens before they hatched.

With me receiving the grad school news this week, it clarifies Lucy and my future plans a little. Lucy has been looking for potential job all along (she's always prepared!) so she'll start interviewing soon. I know she's heard from hospitals at Auburn, AL and Greenville and Charleston, SC so she'll ultimately decide where we'll end up this fall - that's really how we ended up in KS anyway!! I will enjoy the move to a new place.....Not that I don't like Kansas (I will miss many things about it!), but moving is always exciting. It may not be New York....but what is?

For me, I'll have to push my freelance even harder since I know school isn't in the immediate future. I've been holding off sending out mailers because my website hasn't been updated in so long and didn't want the ADs to see the same images. Luckily, my good friend, Sania, is in the middle of rebuilding my site. (yeah!!!). Maybe by this summer, I'll be sending out the first round of my new mailers.

So my recovery continues.....the news I got this week maybe wasn't what I wanted, but the direction I'll be headed can be just as rewarding. I'll continue running, continue inking....and continue to stay positive!! (some new jobs would help with that last one!)

Jason


Site Meter

Friday, March 17, 2006

Another reason to hate taxes

This is my first year having freelance as my sole source of income. Even though my 'business skills' are nothing to brag about, I feel as though I've prepared my small business the best I can. Besides the usual problem of finding customers, advertising, supplies, etc, all small business owners know the aggravations of taxes.

I recently finished my 2005 taxes. I didn't feel confident enought to do them myself so I went to H&R Block and had no problems. It turns out I DID do a decent job of handling my biz and expect to receive a small amount back.

Well, my parents (my address two years ago) call yesterday and it turns out that there IS a problem.....with my 2004 taxes!!! (2004???!!??). Yep, it seems like the IRS expects me to pay (after penalties, etc) 45,000 dollars!!!! because they said I made $96,000 from one of my customers. Anyone who is close to me knows I didn't make 96k....and if I did, it never reached me!! Actually I made $960 from that particular customer and after an IRS screwup (obviously someone whose '0' key was stuck and added TWO extra '0's), the govt is after me. Why this is the FIRST time I've received ANY paperwork from the IRS questioning or asking ANYTHING is beyond me. This is a perfect example that a person can have everything together with your paperwork prepared and still get screwed.

I hate incompetent people. And even worse, I HATE incompetent people who have the power to send letters and expect me to pay money after THEIR screwup. I'm calling the accountant who did my 2004 taxes and contacted the customer who will need to send the 1099 tax form in question. Hopefully after I jump through the many hoops that's sure to come, I can get this resolved.

And if not, does anyone know of a good place I can go into hiding....'cause I WON'T (and when I say 'won't', I mean CAN'T) pay $45,000!!!!

Thank you, IRS. Really....thanks. (and when I say 'thank you', you know what I really mean)




Site Meter

Sunday, March 12, 2006

strange day of weather

You never knew what the weather was gonna give you yesterday. The morning started out warm and sunny so I thought I would enjoy the day with some biking or running. Instead of I was startled out of a nap with tornado sirens! Most of the eastern border of Kansas had a tornado warning with the worst storm centered near downtown KC - about 10 away from me. Luckily, my home didn't see the hail or rain that was only miles away. The storms slowly moved to the northeast - exact the opposite direction from me! Good stuff.

Within 45 minutes of hearing the first siren, it was SUNNY again! Well, I started getting my bike ready to go outside, ate some lunch, but then the clouds rolled in. Let's just say I thought it best to just have a lazy Sunday instead of rolling the dice with this fluxuating weather.

That night, I sketched at the local coffee shop for about an hour. It was very warm and felt like a wonderful night to be outside. Welp...to keep up the trend for the day, a huge storm was coming in the distance filled with high winds and lightening.

Wierd. But I was lucky the bad storms seem to stay away from me. Lawrence, KS got it bad (classes are closed tomorrow with 60% of the campus bldgs damaged) along with Columbia, MO. This link shows an accident only about 45 minutes from my apartment.


Site Meter

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Another take on Bonds and steroids



Site Meter



It's too late to change baseball's fate: The 1990s will forever be known as the steroid generation. Fans, owners, players and journalist all helped by ignoring sometimes obvious problems. As with most things that take us by surprise or hurt us, people want to take immediately actions to solve the problem. What can we do (if anything) to help heal the sport? Should the 'roiders be kicked out of the game? Should there stats have an asterisk? Should certain players be banned from the hall? There are no right answers when it comes to this, but by looking at precedents set by earlier players, I have my own solutions.

What do you think of when I say Shoeless Joe Jackson? Mostly people think of the biggest black eye for baseball ever, the Black Sox scandal. SJJ 'is' a Hall-worthy player (.356 career BA, .408 rookie ave - highest ever, etc) but will never be inducted because of his association with that White Sox team. It doesn't matter that people still debate whether he helped throw the 1919 world series (a judge ruled him innocent), SSJ will always be guilty by association. This is the same situation Barry Bonds finds himself and will ALWAYS be remembered.

Bonds was a Hall-worthy player even before he allegedly started using steroids (1998), and is generally considered the best player in the decade of the 90s. He's never failed a drug test and all steroid allegations seem to bounce off (much like TN in college FB...but that's another story :). But by being the poster-child for the Steroid Generation, his legacy will always be a tainted one. You can't delete his stats from the books because you would be singling out Bonds when there were so many more 'roiders, BUT the good news is that historians won't need to put an asterisk by his statistics because he will always be guilty by association.

Pete Rose is the other player I can draw comparisons to Bonds dilemma. Rose is also a Hall-worthy players. Besides being the all-time hits-kings, Charlie Hustle was one of the most likable players during his day. He is of course banned from baseball and not eligible for Hall consideration even though his biggest sin (betting of the game) occurred AFTER his playing days.

This is one of the biggest arguments for the pro-Bonds crowd. They say he was already Hall-worthy before he started taking the 'roids so even after discounting his stats from 1998-06, he should still be in the Hall. Well, if you go by the Rose case, then no, he shouldn't. BOTH players committed sins against the game. By betting on games, He affected the integrity of the sport. I argue that Bonds did the same thing.

In closing, Bonds will forever be guilty by association. Even though you can't erase his statistics from the records books (you can't single him out), his legacy, like Shoeless Jackson's, is tarnished. Also, both Bonds and Rose had Hall-of-Fame careers, but neither deserve to be in the Hall. Each affected the integrity of the sport by their actions.

Knowing that the 'roiders generation and all their inflated stats will forever be tarnished is all I need to heal. Baseball is about more than 70+ homer seasons. It's about players like Dale Murphy who played the game the right way. It's too bad his stats pale in comparison to the 'roiders, but he has something they never will: integrity.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Game of Shadows

I grew up a sports-lover and followed every sports according to season. I bought baseball cards, memorized stats (which I can still tell you some), and idolized my favorite players. Even one of my birthday cakes was Mark McGwire themed - topped with one of his baseball cards and decorated with green and yellow icing.
Over the years, my love of 'sports' hasn't changed, but my idolization of athletes have. As I started viewing sports through an adult's eyes, I couldn't ignore the fact that the athletes were human and had the same flaws regular people have. The have domestic disputes, drinking/drug problems, and traffic violations; things you can read about everyday in your city's paper. Again, as a fan, I understood everyone has problems but these issues didn't affect their play on the field and the sport directly. That is until the steriod contreversy over the last two decades. Nothing has made me lose more respect for athletes and forced me away from the professional athletics.
I've never been blind to the issue. Even as a kid in the 80s, I saw the changes in the athletes. In the early 90s as Sammy Sosa went from a skinny, base-stealing threat to a hulking, homerun killer, my friends and I joked that we needed to join his off-season workout program. Even though we really didn't know what steroids were and how they worked, my friends and I all assumed his muscle gain wasn't 'natural' because we KNEW he couldn't bulk up that much in one offseason. How the adults and other athletes could ignore this is beyond me.
During my college years as McGwire and Sosa blasted homeruns farther than anyone player before, I found it easy to ignore the problem as well. It was fun every morning reading the box scores and seeing that they hit ANOTHER homerun inching ever closer to historic records. In the back of my mind, I knew that it wasn't natural (along with what I've already mentioned about Sammy, how could McGwire go from an injury-prone 6'5" skinny player to a Paul Bunyan, 70-homer monster?). Yet, all baseball fans chose to look past this because maybe we still idolized the players and their superhuman feats. We wanted them to be able to do things noone is the long history of baseball came close to. Second basemen, traditionally the weak-hitting link of team, were putting up 30+ homerun years. In previous decades, 40 homeruns would probably win the player the HR title, but in the 90s, that number was reached by the allstar break. I call these years the 'Nintendo' years because of the out-of-the-world stats ALL players were putting up. Besides, fans were still healing from the effects of the '94 strike and these feats helped us heal.
So as the information has mounted over the past few seasons of how much steroids were part of the 90s baseball culture, what will heal us from this? I 'knew' Sosa was a user, I understood that McGwire, my childhood idol, did as well. I saw Brady Anderson and how he went from a high of 18 homeruns to 51 the next season, and finally, NOONE could ignore Barry Bonds and his age-defying seasons. As each year passed and more ridiculous stats were put up, the more I became bitter about how these players were ruining the SPORT.
One of the best things about baseball is that the game hasn't changed. It's the one sport you can compare statistics from the 20s to the present day and argue which team or player is better. Sure, the athletes of today are in better shape than years ago, but at the same time, the competition is tougher. Could Babe Ruth be as good today as he was in his generation? How would Alex Rodriguez do against a young Sandy Kofax? Steroids changed this though. You can no longer compare the 90s generation to previous ones because their feats aren't 'natural'. These players were making a joke of the game, and if something wasn't done, irrepreble damage.
Now that a new book is coming out entitled 'Game of Shadows' detailing Barry Bonds' steroid use, maybe this is another step towards healing the game. If you love baseball, you can't enjoy the 90s and what they did to the sport. It's too bad, but as long as baseball is played and those stats are kept, that generation will have to be known as the 'steroid' generation. If it's confirmed that Bonds was a user, do you want to delete his stats? What about Palmero and his documented failed steroid test? What about the other suspicious stats? It's sad because you CAN'T delete one without deleating ALL of them....and that won't happen. Because of everyone (fans, other players, owners and higher-ups) ignoring the problems for so long, the generation is tarnished. All we can do is hope everything comes to light and any player who has used to be confronted.



Site Meter

Monday, March 06, 2006

The critter in our ceiling

Even though I'm typing in St.Louis (due to Lucy having to work here during the month of March), I feel like I'm back in Macon, GA. It seems like we have a 'critter' in our ceiling at our apartment back in KC. I say 'critter' because we don't know if it's a squirrel or a rat, but what we're CERTAIN of is that is scraps, scratches, and claws right above the bed most of the night.

While I lived in Macon in a 'not-so-nice', old home, the season of the year determined what 'critter' I had bothering me. During the winter, I had squirrels running laps in the ceiling. During the Spring, the birds bird a nest in the wall only 2-3 feet from my head and finally during the summer, bugs (roaches) LOVED to come inside the damp, old home.

After those experinces, you figure I'd be used to a pest bothering me, but this past Friday night was the worst. It started going to work around 11:00pm (just as we were going to bed) and only got louder as the night we along. Finally, we just got up, and played video games in my work room (it was still too loud to be in the living room) until 4:00am.

Being in St.Lous for the next few days have allowed us to escpape to quiet place to sleep. Hopefully the maintenance guys will find the 'problem' before I get back.

I hate critters....especially the ones that bother my sleeping.




Site Meter